Appraisal Service Anywhere In The United States
          
		Connections vs. 
        Connectivity 
        By Charlie Elliott, Jr., MAI, SRA 
		A large part of the success 
        of those of us who have a stake in most any industry is personal 
        connections, or at least that has been the conventional wisdom for a 
        long time. We have all heard that “it is not what you know but who you 
        know.” It has not been unusual to hear that a successful person is “well 
        connected” within a business or social community.  
         
        Even those of us who do not consider ourselves well connected in the 
        figurative sense, usually, if we are honest with ourselves, have a deep 
        down appreciation, if not envy, for and of, those who are. There is an 
        art and significant benefit to becoming well connected and it is not the 
        purpose of this article to “pour cold water on” such a noble virtue. To 
        the contrary we are however going to discuss how this concept can be 
        taken to an even higher level.  
         
        The mortgage transaction arena is largely dependant upon our ability to 
        efficiently communicate with one another. This communication is not only 
        a personal one but also a technical one given today’s high-tech 
        environment. We live in a new world today, one that has changed 
        drastically during the career of those of us who have worked in the 
        industry for as few as 10 years.  
         
        As recently as in the early 1980s, the state-of-the-art 
        order-transmission, acceptance, confirmation and recording system in 
        most appraisal offices consisted of a verbal telephone conversation and 
        a record made by hand, on a pink, 4 x 6 “While You Were Out” telephone 
        message pad form. In our company this form was placed in a file folder 
        and given to the appraiser as the only written record of the 
        transaction. It was returned with the completed appraisal in the same 
        file where the appraisal was copied, and the original was mailed to the 
        client. This order form was used for a few years until it was replaced 
        by a larger 5 x 7 Appraisal Order Form Pad produced and offered by an 
        appraisal form supplier. Orders for services were handled in the same 
        fashion for a few more years. In the early ‘90s this system was then 
        replaced by such improvements as fax orders. Then came site based 
        computerized order entry systems and our currently proprietary Web-based 
        management system.  
         
        The system was, and is, made up of a large number of independent venders 
        doing their own thing with little or no accountability or connection to 
        the client. Those who think of the lender-services market of the past as 
        having been made up of a mass of splintered, overly self-serving, 
        sometimes arrogant, mom-and-pop service providers are perhaps not far 
        from the truth, in some cases. It is not hard to understand how vendor 
        service, in the minds of many subscribing to it, may have become what 
        many would consider an oxymoron, something like “Microsoft Works” or 
        “sanitary landfill.” Conversely, many clients have treated vendors in a 
        crass and unappreciated way, perhaps with good reason.  
         
        Today, when financial organizations order closing services from venders, 
        most have a purchase-order system, which ties in nicely with other 
        financial records of their business. They, for the most part, fax these 
        orders to service providers, which re-enter them into their systems, 
        creating a duplication of effort with no connectivity to the source of 
        the orders. Most vendors systems are different from that of their 
        competitors, creating a vast system of unique and independently 
        operating databases of records, maintained by both clients and vendors, 
        none of which are compatible or communicable with one another. 
         
        It is time that we got together as an industry and agreed to subscribe 
        to a single system which will be much more efficient and which holds all 
        parties accountable to the transaction. What if there was one single 
        standard for placing, receiving, recording and confirming orders from 
        financial organizations to that of their venders? The vender would have 
        to do very little data entry, if any, and the client could use the same 
        system with each vender. This would permit online confirmation, 
        communication, product tracking, shipping notification and receiving 
        confirmation.  
         
        The ideal system would be one that subscribed to an international 
        standard for the handling of orders for mortgage loan closing service. 
        This standard would insure that each client and vendor would be “singing 
        off the same page of the hymnal” and doing so in such a way that orders 
        would be entered in systems only one time. That process would be 
        streamlined by using previously entered data from, say, when the loan 
        application was taken, thus requiring very few keystrokes to place 
        orders for title services, credit reports appraisals, etc. There would 
        be very little re-entering or fiddling around with data once it had been 
        entered. Each party would have access to the part of the records which 
        they have a need to know about to include project status, through a 
        seamless system. It would all become a central system of connectivity 
        between the client and the vendor, thus adding a new meaning to the term 
        connections, which shall be referred to herein as connectivity.  
         
        There is already some help on the way. Systems such Real Trans and 
        Appraisal Port are already offering the kind of connectivity as 
        referenced above. It should be noted, however, that these and other 
        systems like them are different and do not subscribe to a single 
        protocol or format. When financial organizations subscribe to these 
        various systems, vendors find themselves having to subscribe to a number 
        of these services, therefore creating a more complex and less useful 
        system than necessary. I vote for a merging of the formats of the 
        platforms mentioned above, allowing a single client, vendor system 
        format available to all clients and vendors. While governmental 
        intervention would be just that, intervention, one wonders if there is 
        not some way for the government to make a positive contribution to 
        establishing a standard, then getting out of the way and letting private 
        industry take the ball and run with it. This can only happen with the 
        blessing and assistance of the various financial industry trade 
        organizations, representing the clients as well as the vendors, and we 
        call upon them to step up to the plate and take an active role in 
        forming this much needed system.  
         
        If one is to believe that connections are the route to success in 
        business, connectivity has to be an even purer and higher road for those 
        willing to earn the fruits of success. Being part of a fully integrated 
        and seamless order entry system, capable of increasing efficiency while 
        delivering a higher level of service to our clients, is the wave of the 
        real estate closing services future.  
         
        Charlie W. Elliott, Jr., MAI, SRA, is 
        President of ELLIOTT® & Company Appraisers, a national real estate 
        appraisal company. He can be reached at (800) 854-5889 or at
        
        charlie@elliottco.com or through the company’s Web site at
        
        www.appraisalsanywhere.com.
         
 |