It Is Broken, So Fix It
            By 
            Charlie Elliott, Jr., MAI, SRA
             
            Sometimes in the 
            interest of accomplishing our current objectives we lose track of 
            why functions of our business are set up the way they are. When it 
            comes to real estate appraisals in the mortgage industry, perhaps we 
            should go all the way back to the beginning and ask ourselves why we 
            have appraisals in the first place. Who decided it would be a good 
            idea to require appraisals on mortgage loans and why?
             
            The concept of 
            using appraisals of real property on transactions where it is used 
            as collateral goes back, at least, to the stock market crash of 75 
            years ago and the Great Depression that followed. Many financial 
            institutions failed during this dark period of our history, due to 
            the fact that the real estate collateral was not enough for them to 
            recoup the loss of defaulted loans. When that happened, those 
            remaining in the business realized that it was necessary for lenders 
            to more accurately determine the value of any potential collateral 
            in order to insure that the collateral was sufficient to support the 
            loans that they were making.
             
            In those days 
            things were a lot different. Most loans were made directly by the 
            banks and thrift institutions and handled by their own staff.  For 
            that matter, many of the appraisers were also on the staff. While 
            managers of these institutions may have had financial incentives to 
            make loans, it was not as prevalent as it is today. There was less 
            room for questions about appraisals since there were few conflicts 
            of interest in the overall program. Back then, the atmosphere was 
            such that a borrower had to go into the bank with hat in hand and 
            practically get down on his knees in order to obtain a loan.
             
            Furthermore, there 
            were fewer people with a direct financial interest at stake as far 
            as whether the loan was made. If its loan officers did not see it as 
            in the best interest of the institution to make a loan, it would not 
            be made. There were few, if any other parties with a direct stake in 
            the loan. Everyone knew that it was in their best interest for the 
            institution to be protected, and most accepted the issue of 
            appraisals and collateral.
             
            Today, things are 
            different in that most loan officers and appraisers financially are 
            tied directly to each deal. Some lenders will say that the appraisal 
            is a necessary evil and that it is the only link holding up progress 
            in the process of making loans. I suppose that the same could be 
            said about the regulatory process in any profession.  
             
            Furthermore, the 
            competition today is such that lenders are practically chasing 
            borrowers in order to make loans. This makes the case for properly 
            prepared appraisals even more important. It seems that many people 
            involved in the process of ordering appraisals, reviewing 
            appraisals, approving appraisals and approving loans have a vested 
            interest that might be in conflict with getting a good, solid 
            appraisal. It is not uncommon for appraisers to hear such comments 
            as “We have to get the value of this appraisal up in order to make 
            the deal,” or “These people may lose their home if the appraisal is 
            not high enough for them to refinance,” or “This is the only deal I 
            have going and I need to pay my rent this month.”
             
            If you are 
            questioning the ethics of some of these comments, you should. In my 
            opinion, they border on being illegal, unethical and, perhaps, 
            fraudulent.  
             
            Perhaps, we need to 
            review what an appraisal really is, what it is for, why we use it 
            and how this relates to what is going on in the real world. 
            Appraisals are for one purpose, and one purpose only. That purpose 
            is to serve as an evaluation of the collateral that is being offered 
            to make the loan and, in conjunction with that, to protect the 
            interest of the financial institution making the loan. The 
            Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal defines an appraisal as “an 
            opinion of value.” It also defines it as “the act or process of 
            developing an opinion of value.” Would it have helped if the 
            definitions had stated “honest opinion of value”?
             
            Now, let’s talk 
            about what an appraisal is not. It is not designed in any way to 
            serve as a tool to insure that someone gets a paycheck. An appraisal 
            is not designed as a tool to help enrich the employees of the 
            financial institution to the detriment of the institution. It is not 
            designed in any way as a tool to save someone from going bankrupt or 
            to keep people from losing their home. Don’t get me wrong; none of 
            us want to see people go broke or get foreclosed upon, but if an 
            inaccurate appraisal is the only thing that can save them, earlier 
            measures should have been taken, which represents a different 
            problem. 
             
            To further 
            demonstrate the problem, mortgage fraud and foreclosures are both 
            at, or near, all-time highs. Appraisers complain about losing 
            accounts because they are not willing to compromise their integrity 
            and hit the number requested by those ordering the appraisal.
             
            Having demonstrated 
            the problem, it would only be fair to state that the majority of 
            lenders ordering appraisals do not expect appraisers to participate 
            in this kind of unprofessional conduct. The few rotten apples, 
            however, are spoiling the whole barrel. 
             
            Who is to blame and 
            who should fix the problem? While I will not condone such unethical 
            and illegal conduct, and I believe that those guilty parties should 
            pay for their deeds, merely punishing those involved will not solve 
            the problem.
             
            This problem has 
            been allowed to exist by our government regulators. They, at a 
            minimum, have control over it and a responsibility to correct it. 
            Anyone with a rudimentary understanding of how the mortgage and 
            appraisal business works must see that this system stinks to high 
            heaven. There are so-called standards in place to prevent those, who 
            are receiving financial incentives for selling loans, from ordering 
            the appraisals on those loans. These rules are, quite simply, too 
            loose and are not enforced.
             
            Mr. Comptroller of 
            the Currency and others in similar positions within the federal 
            government, the system is broken and should be fixed. It permits the 
            less scrupulous within our financial-services system to bleed off 
            business from those who play by the rules and, in addition, causes 
            billions of dollars to be lost annually from financial institutions 
            and foreclosed loans.