| Appraisal Service Anywhere In The United States  
 Why Appraisal 
        Management Companies are Important 
        The value proposition lenders 
        can't afford to ignore.
 
 Lately Appraisal Management 
Companies (AMCs) have been in the news. In fact, few people had heard of AMCs 
until recently. Perhaps that is because they are business-to- business entities, 
usually not catering to the general public. 
 AMCs, by definition, are vendor management companies acting on behalf of 
appraisal users. AMCs are becoming more popular among lenders and not everyone 
is pleased. Why would anyone care whether a bank outsources its appraisals? 
Further, why would a bank want to farm out its appraisals?
 
 Lenders outsource these services for three reasons. First, it helps reduce fraud 
between the lender's salespeople and the appraiser, thus reducing losses while 
pleasing the regulators. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac recently implemented new 
rules regarding this which some say favors outsourcing to AMCs. Secondly, it 
saves the bank money. Banks have high overhead and cannot compete with the 
efficiencies AMCs offer. Finally, some banks are subscribing to vender 
management because of federal RESPA laws. RESPA, in part, is designed to protect 
consumers from fee gouging. Banks must account for closing cost fees charged to 
customers. It is hard for them to define and recoup all of these costs. 
Collectively these issues cause banks to outsource their appraisals. It is easy 
to explain to regulators, it protects their bottom line and it frees management 
to do what they do best, make loans.
 
 Now, back to who would object to banks outsourcing appraisals. Ironically, the 
idea seems to be okay with everyone except some in the appraisal profession. One 
may think that all appraisers would appreciate the reduced loan officer pressure 
offered by the AMCs. This is simply not always the case. Some appraisers 
villainize AMCs. Appraisers and appraisal organizations are banding together to 
promote anti-AMC legislation at the state level that would require, among other 
things, that AMCs register with state appraisal boards. Among those other 
requirements are large registration fees and complex regulatory demands. Some 
say that requiring AMCs to register in 50 states and to comply with all 
regulations will put AMCs out of business. This would appear to be the goal of 
those sponsoring the legislation.
 
 There are two primary reasons these groups are opposed to AMCs. First, many 
appraisers do not like the scrutiny offered by AMCs, opting for the more relaxed 
relationship and oversight offered by the lender. There is opposition to 
delivery schedule timetables sometimes imposed by some AMCs. There is further 
opposition to the AMC appraiser fee controls, similar to that experienced by the 
medical profession regarding doctors and insurance companies.
 
 It should be noted that not all AMCs operate in the same way nor do they have 
the same policies. Just as with banks and appraisers not all AMCs are perfect. 
Secondly, in spite of what many appraisers say about wanting independence, some 
are willing to trade this for the cozy relationship they enjoy with lenders, who 
select them to do work. Appraisers have the option of either doing AMC work or 
declining it. Appraisal management is part of our free enterprise system.
 
 There are misconceptions about fees collected and paid by AMCs. I have heard 
appraisers say that AMCs collect full fees and pay out only a portion of the fee 
to the appraiser. AMCs do operate on a gross margin of profit, just like many 
other businesses. No management company is going to be any more willing or able 
to perform services for free than an appraiser would be.
 
 Fees charged for a standard home appraisal vary from region to region, but we 
can talk about percentages. Typically, the gross margin a well-managed appraisal 
management firm will earn will fall between 20 and 40 percent. That means that 
the AMC will operate on about 1/3 of the fees typically charged for the 
valuations delivered to lenders. Therefore, of every $100 earned by the AMC in 
gross income, the appraiser earns, on average, about $70, leaving the AMC with 
$30 to pay all of its expenses and provide any profit that it may make.
 For this fee the AMC must: 
  
  Accept the appraisal order
  Proof and edit it
  Select the best appraiser
  Negotiate a fee
  Place the order
  Monitor the progress
  Take product delivery
  Review the appraisal
  Supervise corrections
  Ship the appraisal
  Field any client questions
  Bill the client
  Pay the appraiser
  Collect client fees, and
  Securely store the product for 
  five years  These functions involve mostly labor 
expenses associated with communicating with the client and vendor and processing 
information. They do not reflect other overhead costs incurred by the AMC, such 
as rent, utilities, janitorial, liability insurance, equipment, supplies, 
advertising, legal, accounting, technology, and more. Nor do they reflect the 
extensive sales and marketing or travel and entertainment expenses that come 
with marketing the AMC and its fee panel appraisers to national and regional 
lenders. 
 There will be varying opinions on AMCs and their role in the vender management 
process. It is not suggested that every lender should use an AMC or that every 
appraiser should work for one. Lenders and appraisers have the right to pursue a 
variety of different business relationships. They should be allowed to exercise 
this right without disruption from those who do not have a dog in the fight. AMC 
registration in each state is simply a burdensome minefield and is perceived by 
some as a violation of free trade. Any AMC regulation should be at the federal 
level, only one fee should be charged and rules should be uniform across the 
country.
 
 Finally, there can be no question that AMCs offer by far the best possible 
solution to deter mortgage fraud. The true separation of the lending and 
appraisal processes can only be accomplished in this manner. Separating these 
processes removes most of the opportunity and temptation for participants to 
become involved in collusion, which is the root of most valuation fraud cases.
 
 AMCs also represent our best option for holding down mortgage fee cost to 
consumers and encouraging competition among appraisers. In these trying economic 
times given the mortgage crisis and the economic meltdown, AMCs represent a 
bright ray of positive direction for the mortgage industry.
 CharlieW. Elliott, JR.,MAI, SRA, is 
president of Elliott & Company Appraisers, a national real estate appraisal 
company. He can be reached at (800) 854-5889, 
 charlie@elliottco.comThis email address is being protected from 
spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it
   or through the company's Web site at 
www.appraisalsanywhere.com .  |